Write down the trapezium rule
A≈2h[y0+y5+2(y1+⋯+y4)] Add the first and last ordinates, add twice every ordinate in between, then multiply by half the strip width.
Find the strip width
h=55−0=1 The interval from t=0 to t=5 is split into 5 equal strips.
Ordinate y0 at t=0
Substitute t=0 into 40−t2.
Ordinate y1 at t=1
Substitute t=1 into 40−t2.
Ordinate y2 at t=2
Substitute t=2 into 40−t2.
Ordinate y3 at t=3
Substitute t=3 into 40−t2.
Ordinate y4 at t=4
Substitute t=4 into 40−t2.
Ordinate y5 at t=5
Substitute t=5 into 40−t2.
Add the two end ordinates
y0+y5=40+15=55 The first and last ordinates are each used once.
Add the middle ordinates
39+36+31+24=130 Every ordinate strictly between the ends is used twice, so total them first.
Substitute into the rule
A≈21[40+15+2(39+36+31+24)] Ends once each, middles twice each.
Work out the estimate
A≈21×315=157.5 The bracket totals 315; multiplying by half the strip width (0.5) gives the estimate.
Is it an over- or under-estimate?
under-estimate The curve is concave here (it bends downwards), so every chord lies BELOW the curve. Each trapezium misses a sliver of area, and the estimate is an UNDER-estimate.
How to improve the estimate
more strips⇒smaller error Narrower strips hug the curve more closely, so the total sliver of missed or extra area shrinks and the estimate improves. The direction of the bias does not change.
State the estimate
A≈157.5 m The estimated distance is 157.5 m. The speed–time curve is concave, so the chords lie below it and the estimate is an under-estimate.