State the requirements
National, representative, register, computer The study is national, needs high representativeness across regions and ages, and has a full register plus a computer. The method must use these strengths.
List the candidate methods
SRS, systematic, stratified, quota, opportunity The five standard methods are simple random, systematic, stratified, quota and opportunity. We assess each against the requirements.
Assess opportunity sampling
Not representative Opportunity sampling uses whoever is available and ignores regions and ages. So it fails the representativeness requirement.
Assess quota sampling
Non-random, wastes register Quota sampling controls groups but selects non-randomly and does not use the register. It risks interviewer bias, so it is not ideal.
Assess simple random sampling
Random but groups by chance Simple random sampling uses the register fairly, but region and age balance is left to chance. Small regions could be under-represented.
Assess systematic sampling
Even spacing, no group control Systematic sampling is easy on a computer but does not guarantee proportional regions and ages. It also risks periodicity in an ordered list.
Assess stratified sampling
Groups + proportion + random Stratified sampling divides the register into region and age strata and samples each in proportion at random. This directly targets representativeness.
Use the register
Register gives every member The complete register lets us identify each person's region and age. So we can form the strata accurately.
Use the computer
Computer allocates and selects A computer can quickly compute proportional shares and pick random members from each stratum. So the extra work of stratification is easy here.
Note the representativeness gain
Guarantees proportional groups Stratified sampling guarantees each region and age group appears in proportion. This is exactly what the study needs.
Note the randomness benefit
Random within strata Selection within each stratum is random, so bias is minimised. This beats quota sampling's non-random choice.
Compare with simple random
Stratified>SRS for balance Unlike simple random sampling, stratified sampling removes the risk of chance imbalance between groups. So it is more representative.
Weigh the trade-off
Needs group sizes, which we have Stratified sampling needs known group sizes, and the register provides them. So the only drawback is covered.
Eliminate the weaker methods
Others fail a requirement Opportunity, quota, simple random and systematic each fail on representativeness or use of the register. So they are eliminated.
Select stratified sampling
Best fit for all requirements Stratified random sampling meets every requirement using the register and computer. So it is the best method.
Conclude
Stratified random sampling So stratified random sampling is best: the computer allocates proportional random samples to each region and age stratum from the register, giving high representativeness. That is the correct choice.
AnswerStratified random sampling, because the computer can allocate proportional random samples to each region and age stratum from the register, giving high representativeness.