Write the model
I=I0e−0.15x Light intensity falls with depth x metres; μ=0.15 per metre is the attenuation constant.
Set up the 5% equation
e−0.15x=0.05 We want the depth where intensity is 5% of the surface value; the I_0 cancels.
Take natural logs
−0.15x=ln0.05 Logs bring the power down.
Evaluate ln 0.05
−0.15x=−2.9957 ln 0.05 ≈ -2.9957 (negative, since 0.05 < 1).
Solve for the depth x
x=−0.15−2.9957=19.97 So the intensity is 5% at about 19.97 m depth.
Now find the intensity at 10 m
I0I=e−0.15×10 Use the same model to check the intensity at 10 m.
Work out the power
−0.15×10=−1.5 Multiply out the exponent.
Evaluate
e−1.5=0.2231 e^{-1.5} ≈ 0.2231.
Convert to a percentage
So about 22.31% of surface light remains at 10 m. The required answer is the depth, ≈ 19.97 m.
State the final answer clearly
x=19.97 m Here is our result written out on its own. It is worth stating it clearly, with the correct units and to the accuracy the question asked for.
Interpret the answer in context
x=19.97 m Always turn the number back into words for the real situation. Ask yourself: does this value make sense for the population, temperature, mass or money in the question?
Why logarithms were the key tool
ln(ex)=x,log(10x)=x The variable started trapped inside a power. Logs work because they are the exact inverse of raising a base to a power, so they bring the unknown down where we can reach it.
Link back to the log and index laws
log(pq)=logp+logq,log(pn)=nlogp These are the same log and index rules you met earlier in the course. Exponential modelling simply uses them in a real-world setting, so revising them always helps here.
Watch out for a common error
isolate the exponential BEFORE taking logs A very common slip is to take logs while a number is still multiplying the exponential term. Always get the e… (or the power) on its own first, then log.
Check the answer is reasonable
x=19.97 m Sanity-check the size and sign: a growth model should give increasing values and a decay model decreasing ones, and a time should come out positive.